<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>vampire</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/tags/vampire</link>
<description>New posts about vampire</description>
<item>
<title>Daughters of Darkness: Pale, Anemic Vampire Movie</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Horror/Daughters-of-Darkness-Pale-Anemic-Vampire-Movie.75988</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I just saw "Daughters of Darkness" (1971) the '100 minute' special 'Director's Cut' , the director being Harry Kumel.  It is the story of the latter-day exploits of Countess Elizabeth Bathory, as played by Delphine Sayrig, who looks remarkably like a faded "Aunt Peg" Juliet Anderson who did some films which left nothing to the imagination in the 1970's and '80's. This Countess and her violent exploits leave almost everything to the imagination, because unlike her name-sake who lived 400 years ago, who "bathed in the blood of 300 virgins" we don't see any virgins and not very much violence or blood in this film.  <br /> <br />Yes, the countess and her companion have ostensibly been killing young people and draining their blood throughout the northern European countryside in this film, but although a body turns up, all we see is a pale hand dangling from a stretcher.  None of their vampiric depradations are shown.  It is said to be a cost-cutting trick to TELL but not SHOW important events in a film;  but a trick that leaves the viewer feel cheated. This film has a lot of that. Now the Countess and her very attractive young helper, played by Andrea Rau, are fleeing the scene of some of their recent crimes. <br /> <br />They happen to arrive at an icy coastside Baltic hotel where a young couple (played by John Karlen as a rather unlikeable, violent bridegroom who, appearance-wise, could pass as the blonde guy in ABBA), are having the first few days of their honeymoon.  The countess and her young companion, Andrea Rau, have issues;  Andrea "wants out", but cannot effect an escape. Besides, she is too thirsty for blood to ever really leave the side of the Countess. The Countess is enamoured with both the young wife (Danielle Ouimet) and her husband (Karlen) and quickly gets the wife under her mental control.</p>
<p>It doesn't help when wifey catches the bridegroom on the floor, naked with Andrea Rau.  Fortunately, or perhaps unfortunately, Andrea is dead, a straight-razor having slipped and somehow killed her while Karlen was sexually grappling with her.  We are not shown where the razor cut her, there are no cuts and just a little blood. This is not what one expects in a vampire movie.  Andrea Rau is sexy whether she's alive or dead. She surely has the most sensuous, thick, pouting lips of any star of stage or screen, made even larger by a generous helping of dark red lipstick.  Too bad more of the movie couldn't have featured Andrea Rau and less the fading late 30's glamor of the Countess who appears in dozens and dozens more shots than her young understudy does. <br /> <br />This film looks and feels like a sequel.  Unfortunately, there was no previous movie. Maybe one should have been made, but wasn't. And too late now to do it, 35 years after the fact. As an example of the "sequel" feeling:  there is an old retired police inspector, reduced now to peddling around the countryside on a bicycle, with knowing looks in his eye, who certainly is aware of what the dread countess is up to, and shadows her. He obviously knows the bloody countess from some past run-ins, but  nothing more is said about it,  and his threat is quickly put to a violent, slightly comical end.  Nothing ever comes of him.  There is also a Germanic sort of stuffy, puffed-up desk clerk in the dreary abandoned hotel who remembers the countess from 40 years earlier, when some wicked, unelaborated events took place.  He remarks that she looked just the same 40 years ago as she does today, but nobody believes he could be talking about the same person.  We're left wishing we could have seen that movie.<br /> <br />There is a stark lack of people in this film. The seaside hotel has fewer people in winter than the Overlook Hotel in Stephen King's The Shining.  Some of this makes no sense at all. The young honeymoon couple indulge in a wonderful gourmet dinner in a dining hall totally empty except for themselves. Hard to believe there is a kitchen staff there slaving away in back for the sake of one or two diners, but we have no idea where this fine meal came from, or who served it, since there are no waiters or waitresses, either.  It could've been take-out. <br /> <br />The highest point of intense sexual tension occur when Lady Bathory puts her hands all over the young hubby, played by Karlen, while wifey understandably freaks-out, watching in growing horror from 10 feet away as the Countesses' caresses become more and more intimate while she and her male prey (although she prefers females), recite a litany of the bloody deeds of the historical countess, 400 years earlier.  There is a powerful sense of how eroticism, torture and violent bloodshed all come together, as both Bathory and hubby grow ecstatic during what they are saying, lines such as:  "pinched their nipples with silver tongs!"   Unfortunately, it doesn't get any better than that in this movie;  so the best part is nothing but a tease.<br /> <br />A cheap and quick exit is made at the end which will leave most viewers unsatisfied. This is followed by a twist as we are shown that the evil lives on.  But it is only a vague suggestion of violence and bloodshed, as during most of the rest of the movie, things are suggested but very little is shown.  In the entire film there is only one brief scene of vampires feeding on newly-spilled blood, but it is rather unconvincing, since their victim had his wrists cut when a glass punchbowl that they were pressing down on his face broke into two parts, each of which just happened to roll down and sever his wrists.<br /> <br />Seeing this almost incomprehensible 'Director's Cut' makes me sort of want to see the cut version which was originally shown in the U.S., which ran 12 minutes shorter.  Maybe less was more, in this case.  The version I saw is marked NOT RATED, although there is some female nudity and quite a bit of graphic groping around, mostly by the young newlyweds in the early scenes.  But probably not a film for the youngsters!</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FHorror%2FDaughters-of-Darkness-Pale-Anemic-Vampire-Movie.75988"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FHorror%2FDaughters-of-Darkness-Pale-Anemic-Vampire-Movie.75988" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:48:42 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Germs and the Supernatural</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Horror/Germs-and-the-Supernatural.72824</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Since we first discovered them in our microscopes, man has had a fear of germs.  These tiny, microscopic organisms attack our bodies at the cellular level, causing all sorts of havoc.  The end result is that we get sick, from a simple cold that quickly becomes an annoyance, to a deadly disease that ravages us to the point of death.  Cures for such ailments exist, but only for a handful and often must applied at a certain time or else it could be too late.  It this sort of thing that has caused man to develop into a clean-thinking society to the point of being hypochondriac, obsessive-compulsives.</p>
 
<p>Naturally, Hollywood has capitalized on this fear.  Movies, in particularly horror films, have used the idea of germs and germ spreading as plot points to move a story.  Probably the most notable of this is Cabin Fever, which obviously uses germs, in particular a flesh eating virus, to attack a group of campers and spread fear and paranoia among them.  However, this is not a recent idea, and nor has it been so obvious.  In fact, probably long before man developed the fear of germs it has now, Hollywood worked the idea into its early horror films and most famous monsters.  Creatures such as vampires, werewolves and zombies all are very different in nature, but they have a couple things in common.  First, they are all of supernatural origin and legend.  And second, in Hollywood what makes them what they are can be transferred by biting, much like the disease known as rabies.</p>
 
<p>In other words, they made more of themselves by spreading germs.  Lets take a look at these three famous monsters of horror, comparing to their original legends and Hollywood has used their own twists to help expand the fear of germs.</p>
 
<h3>VAMPIRES</h3>
 
<p>There is no more recognizable monster of horror than the vampire.  Made famous by writers such as Bram Stoker and Anne Rice, as well as actors such as Bela Legosi, the popularity and image of the vampire is one of the biggest points of pop culture in our modern society.  In the eyes of Hollywood, the vampire is often a handsome, seductive being who lures unsuspecting victims with his or her gaze, seducing them into surrender in order to drink their blood.  They do this by biting them, usually on the neck with their fangs.  Sometimes the victim is drained dry, but more often than not he or she ends up becoming a vampire themselves.  Sometimes the bite alone is enough, but usually is also requires a drinking of the vampire's own blood to complete the process.</p>
 
<p>Surprisingly, Hollywood didn't have to change too much in terms of the vampire.  While the original legends stated one could become a vampire if an animal jumped over a corpse or if the person had rebelled against the church in their life (and those are just a couple of ideas), a person could also become a vampire if one bit them.  So that concept has always been there.  Modern pop culture has simply re-imagined how the process worked, such how many bites and/or how much blood had to be drawn, or if the vampire's own blood had to be used.  Just like they changed how a vampire might look, as compared to original legends where it was said a vampire was either gaunt and pale or bloated and ruddy-colored in appearance.  More recently has vampirism been viewed on a scientific level rather than a supernatural one, treating the condition like a disease.  It began with Robert Matheson's novel I Am Legend and continues to this day with films like Blade and Underworld.</p>
 
<h3>WEREWOLVES</h3>
 
<p>Werewolves are another monster Hollywood has reworked a bit.  The original legends of the werewolf, the man who has assumed the shape of a wolf, state that one would become the wolf by putting a piece of clothing made from wolfskin, usually a belt.  In other cases, there was a special salve that was rubbed on the body, probably made from wolf fat.  Even drinking water from a wolf's pawprint would do the job.  Then, of course, there was making a deal with the Devil.  These, of course, were all voluntary means of doing so, meaning the person becoming the werewolf had ill-intentions from the start.  In some cases being a werewolf was still seen as a curse, the cause being either a birth on Christmas Eve, being born from werewolf parents or being cursed by a witch.</p>
 
<p>Hollywood, of course, reworked things to go a little easier.  In early films such as The Wolf Man, one became a werewolf simply by being bitten by one.  This, in a way, works on the involuntary side of becoming a werewolf, making the concept a curse and the person a sympathetic being who wants to be cured.  Naturally, it didn't take long for other modern writers and film makers to jump on this idea, which has now stuck.  And just like vampirism, being a werewolf is now often seen as a genetic affliction on par with an infectious disease, passed on hereditarily or through a bite or other transfer of body fluids.  In a way, werewolfism is almost the true supernatural version of rabies.</p>
 
<h3>ZOMBIES</h3>
 
<p>Now if there's a monster that's been completely reworked by Hollywood to fit man's fear of germs, it's the zombie.  The basic concept is the same, a corpse that has risen from the dead in a mindless state.  But the original Voodoo concept is that the corpse is raised by a bokor, or Voodoo sorcerer, to serve as a slave.  Living people could also be turned into zombies, or at least a zombie-like state, by means of a combination of two unique powders injected into the bloodstream.  The first, called coup de poudre, puts the victim into a death-like state due to the key ingredient, tetrodotoxin, which is found in pufferfish.  Once injected in near-lethal doses, the powder puts the victim into a state of near-death for several days, all while remaining conscious.  Then the second powder, which is composed of dissociatives like datura, is added, which puts the victim into the zombie-like state, where they have no will of their own.  In either case, if they're going around attacking people, it's because they were ordered to by their bokor masters, and its doubtful they would eat anyone.</p>
 
<p>But thanks to films like Night of the Living Dead, the idea that people have of a zombie has changed dramatically.  The zombie is still a corpse that rises up and is still totally mindless, but now not only are they truly &amp;ldquo;living dead&amp;rdquo;, but they attack anyone in sight and eat them.  And anyone who ends up simply being bitten will end up being turned into a zombie themselves.  Voodoo magic isn't the cause of this; instead its rather a virus either man-made or space-born that's the cause of the initial infection and resulting plague.  Recent films like 28 Days Later added the idea of contact with a zombie's blood could spread the infection.</p>
 
<p>With such concepts and ideas being used since the "40s and "50s, you can see why man has developed a fear of germs and still continues to have it.  Regular viruses and diseases are bad enough.  What about one that would, literally, turn you into some kind of monster, no longer considered human?  And thanks to recent films treating the concept on a scientific level and even calling such conditions viruses and infections, you can bet that man's fear of germs isn't going to go away any time soon.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FHorror%2FGerms-and-the-Supernatural.72824"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FHorror%2FGerms-and-the-Supernatural.72824" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:01:22 PST</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
