<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Mark Wahlberg</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/tags/Mark Wahlberg</link>
<description>New posts about Mark Wahlberg</description>
<item>
<title>The Happening</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Science-Fiction/The-Happening.160715</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I liked it. I'd give it a 7.2 out of 10. Many many reviews have been less than fair and probably 1 in 100 people saw it the way I did.</p>
<p>Some complain about the lack of logic and that it was not believable: um, it's a sci-fi movie, people! You know, like Men in Black or Jurrasic Park? The story had an originality to it! It's like after I watched The Village again, some thought it was such a creative film while many disected and lost the point.</p>
<p>Draggy: You have ADD, don't you.</p>
<p>Bad acting and bad script: I thought both "wooden" acting and script added to the movie's eerie feel. I have to admit that the script had me thinking about high-school plays again but this film wasn't about brilliant script. I will also admit that I couldn't connect to the characters' emotions during some parts of the movie. And I still think that added to the film's tone and feel. I'm not even a confirmed fan yet. I'm still trying to figure him out, especially after Lady in the Water.</p>
<p>The story was fresh and I liked the simplicity.</p>
<p>It's a Shyamalan film alright.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FScience-Fiction%2FThe-Happening.160715"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FScience-Fiction%2FThe-Happening.160715" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:16:17 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>The Happening</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Thriller/The-Happening.158209</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Last Saturday my friends and I decided to visit the cinema again, see one of the latest blockbuster films, surprisingly we have already seen all the "good" movies that were showing at that time, the last reserve choice left was The Happening. From the movie I picked up some good and critical ideas, so here's a brief review of what I thought of the film.</p>
<h3>What Is It About?</h3>
<p>'The Happening' is a mysterious thriller about a science teacher (Mark Wahlberg) who discovers that  the area of his county has been infected with a killer virus.</p>
<p>All the living things, contaminated with the virus, seem to brutally take their own lives away. People kill themselves as if programmed to do so. The only explanation, for this, is the air travelling disease, which confuses the mind-changing human nature from attraction to live,  to committing suicide.</p>
<p>Mark Wahlberg's character questions, if the plants are releasing deadly chemicals towards humans, or is there a bigger picture behind all of this?</p>
<p>While the only survivors try to escape the invisible death threat, less people make it alive.</p>
<h3>How Was It?</h3>
<p>The movie started with an impressive shock wave. Fierce suicidal scenes, have definitely interested the audience. Unfortunately  there was a lack of creativity, with the rest of the movie, as it tumbled down without a remarkable comeback or potentially interesting phenomenon. As according to <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com" target="_blank">Rotten Tomatoes</a> <strong>&amp;ldquo;</strong>The Happening begins with promise, but unfortunately descends into an incoherent and unconvincing trifle.&amp;rdquo;<br /><br /><img src="http://images.stanzapub.com/readers/cinemaroll/2008/07/06/207171_1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Rating: Two out of Five Stars</p>
<h3>Verdict</h3>
<p>The movie was certainly something new to watch, but not something I would watch again. &amp;ldquo;The happening&amp;rdquo;  was mysterious enough, although  wasn't as psychologically challenging as I expected it to be. Actors, have done a great job, the chemistry between the main couple was a life saver of the movie.</p>
<p>&amp;nbsp;</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FThriller%2FThe-Happening.158209"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FThriller%2FThe-Happening.158209" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:47:10 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Why Scorsese's "The Departed" is Really About Terrorism</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Action/Why-Scorseses-The-Departed-is-Really-About-Terrorism.127960</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>The Departed (2006), Martin Scorsese's competent, auteurist reworking of the Hong Kong crime-drama trilogy Internal Affairs [directed by Andrew Lau] deals aesthetically and thematically with the potential duality and mystery of individual identity.  The theme reverberates for the film's American viewers due to the nation's collective uncertainty of loyalty in a post 9/11 historical context.  As controversial, if not more so than the Vietnam War, the on-going United States war in Iraq that the 9/11 World Trade Center attack spawned has divided sentiments and generated comparable levels of support and objection amongst its population and has even managed to promote dialogue for both sides of the argument over whether or not the United States has the privilege to police the world.</p>
 
<p>Whether the United States is the global equivalent of a justified policeman, a sanctimonious criminal, or a muddled combination of the two is personally explored in the narrative of The Departed through the lives of two Massachusetts State Policemen, one of whom is posing as a criminal (Leonardo DiCaprio) while the other (Matt Damon) is quite genuinely integrated into mob boss, Frank Costello's (Jack Nicholson) crime syndicate.  In Scorsese's opening sequence, Costello, bestowing advice unto a young Colin Sullivan, declares, &amp;ldquo;When I was your age they used to say you could become cops or criminals. What I'm saying to you is this...When you're facing a loaded gun, what's the difference?&amp;rdquo;  In terms of war, Costello's &amp;ldquo;what's the difference?&amp;rdquo; simultaneously validates and condemns America's self-superior and noble interference in the political schemas of foreign countries by casting the nation as the amalgamation of gallant and morally negotiable intentions.</p>
 
<p>Besides parallels between the sentiments of the American public and the thematic preoccupations of the film, The Departed makes direct references to the prevailing paranoia about terrorism today and to the current and possible political agendas of the future United States.  In Captain Queenan's (Martin Sheen) speech of narrative exposition to William Costigan (DiCaprio) early on, Queenan announces &amp;ldquo;We (The United States) will probably be at war with the Chinese in twenty-odd years and Costello is selling a military technology.&amp;rdquo;  Special significance should be attributed to the fact that it is this particular crime, the obtaining and bartering of United States military technology, for which Costello is most vilified.  The initial stakeout and sting operation performed by the Special Investigation Unit (to which the corrupt Sullivan gets promoted) is not concerned with the murders that Scorsese allows the audience to see Costello commit or the drugs being peddled by his number one, Mr. French (Ray Winstone).</p>
<p>Instead the focus centers on Costello's apparent betrayal of American, terrorist paranoia, namely his selling of military microprocessors.  Even though the sting operation fails and Costello and his Chinese buyers appear to have made their transaction without a hitch, Scorsese directs The Departed to satisfy American patriotism by revealing that not even Costello, in his unadulterated wickedness could deliver military secrets into the hands of a foreign government.  By arranging for Costello to double-cross his Chinese buyers, Scorsese serves two purposes; He maintains Costello's villainous persona while concurrently preserving America's safety from retribution, deserved or not, from a foreign threat.</p>
 
<p>Costello's importance to the narrative as a villain cannot be overstated, considering the values for which he stands, and considering that he is the antithesis of the &amp;ldquo;Serve and Protect&amp;rdquo; SIU that he has infiltrated.  The Irish mob boss begins the film in voice over with his perverse interpretation of the &amp;ldquo;American Dream.&amp;rdquo;  Over newsreel footage of the race riots in Boston &amp;ldquo;some years ago,&amp;rdquo; Frank Costello declares, &amp;ldquo;I don't want to be a product of my environment.  I want my environment to be a product of me&amp;hellip;Twenty years after an Irishman couldn't get a fucking job, we had the presidency&amp;hellip;No one gives it to you.  You have to take it.&amp;rdquo;  In the very next scene, Scorsese shows Costello in his neighborhood &amp;ldquo;shaking down&amp;rdquo; a local grocery store clerk, essentially taking &amp;ldquo;it.&amp;rdquo;</p>
<p>From that moment on, Costello's role in the narrative is to force his reading of the American Dream upon as many people as possible and it becomes up to those people to discover their identity within Costello's greedy interpretation.  Costello alternately advises Sullivan and Costigan in his way of thinking, passing along such mantras and insights as &amp;ldquo;A man has to make his own way,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;I haven't needed the money since I took Archie's milk money in third grade.  And to tell you the truth I don't need pussy anymore either&amp;hellip;But I like it.&amp;rdquo;  Sullivan and Costigan, the respective recipients of this skewed advice, represent opposing values while sharing similar identities.</p>
 
<p>Sullivan, Costello's deceitful, conniving, SIU mole operates toward personal ends and embodies the ardent pursuer of personal wealth who characteristically views America's policing of the world as a right by a survival of the fittest attitude.  Costigan, the equally deceitful, conflicted &amp;ldquo;rat&amp;rdquo; in Costello's crew sacrifices personal time and ambition in order to serve the commonwealth, channeling the modern counterculture, which objects to the United States occupation of Iraq as well as the American government's self-appointed duty to bring democracy to the rest of the world.  Though strikingly similar, Sullivan's and Costigan's relevant deception of SIU and Frank Costello differ most decidedly in whom each deceives and whom each believes he is deceiving.</p>
 
<p>William Costigan initially believes he is misleading no one.  As a cadet at the Police Academy, Costigan (like Sullivan) genuinely performs well enough to be assigned to SIU's Undercover Department.  In his first council with Captain Queenan and Staff Sergeant Dignam (Mark Wahlberg), Dignam ridicules Costigan's tragic lineage and speculates as to why he joined the state police.  Immediately afterwards Queenan alleges about his department, &amp;ldquo;We deal in deception here.  What we do not deal with is self-deception.&amp;rdquo;  The &amp;ldquo;here&amp;rdquo; that the captain refers to is of course SIU, which acts as the upholder of, even if not the participator in [as evidenced by Dignam and Captain Ellerby (Alec Baldwin)], the moral standard of America and consequently the ethical voice of The Departed.  With that ethical voice, Queenan condemns self-deception.  Costigan generally heeds Captain Queenan's warning and identifies for much of the film with neither cop nor criminal.</p>
<p>After a year of undercover work, his behavioral deception takes its toll on him and Costigan, in a heated exchange with Dignam proclaims, &amp;ldquo;I can't be someone else every fucking day.&amp;rdquo;  The statement supports Costigan's avoidance of the perilous self-deception, yet once Costigan is officially retired from having to deceive Costello and his crew as well as everyone outside of Queenan and Dignam, Costigan betrays Queenan's warning.  After steadfastly declaring to Sullivan in their first meeting late in the film, &amp;ldquo;Being a cop's not an identity.  I want my identity back,&amp;rdquo; Costigan attempts to arrest Sullivan, contradicting what he knows to not be his identity.  Reassuming the cop role after Queenan's warning and his own declaration, Costigan is not permitted to survive The Departed.</p>
 
<p>Sullivan too, must deceive everyone, even Costello, the man he had been most loyal to since the film's first sequence.  He deceives his unit, his employers, his father figure, Costigan, and his fianc&amp;eacute;, but like Costigan, Sullivan's most menacing moments of deception occur when he allows is personal ambitions to deceive himself.  Sullivan often looks to the State Senate on Beacon Hill in the film, minimally but effectively expressing his desire to become an ever-important authority figure in an institution that ideally exists to uphold the moral fiber of American values.  The problem with this of course is that Sullivan is morally negotiable and not ideally dependable in his ethical ideology.</p>
<p>Sullivan seems always trying to convince himself that he can attain this status even through his whole-hearted acceptance of Costello's perversion of the American Dream.  The ultimate deception of himself comes after Costigan's murder, when Sullivan attempts to assume the power to judge the moral integrity of another, by recommending Costigan for the Medal of Merit.  Two scenes later, Dignam, the last man remaining from SIU (besides Captain Ellerby) executes Sullivan in the same way that Costigan was killed.</p>
 
<p>Scorsese's denunciation of the perverse interpretation of the American Dream as well as the importance of defining oneself within it, is well supported through the narrative events of The Departed.  Scorsese interestingly pardons neither Sullivan nor Costigan for his transgressions of duality.  However, the ultimate triumph is still enjoyed by the morally upstanding who aspire to punish the wicked.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FAction%2FWhy-Scorseses-The-Departed-is-Really-About-Terrorism.127960"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FAction%2FWhy-Scorseses-The-Departed-is-Really-About-Terrorism.127960" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:10:02 PST</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
