<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>but</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/tags/but</link>
<description>New posts about but</description>
<item>
<title>Separate But Equal</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Documentary/Separate-But-Equal.66602</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>	The movie Separate but Equal takes place in the year 1950 and America is segregated from blacks and whites. Everything from schools and water fountains cannot be be shared by blacks and whites. It has been about a hundred years since slavery was banned in the United States, but segregation is still a legal practice. Although the law says blacks and whites are to be keep separate but have equal facilities, but that is not the case. Blacks have schools that are far worse and have less materials and funding than the white facilities. The movie starts with a school in Claredon County, South Carolina is denied a bus by white school officials. The need for the school bus was important because black students had to walk several miles to get to their designated schools each day.The events recapped in the movie take place in a wide array of settings from a small classroom, to diners, to the Supreme Court itself. Eventually the outcome of this decision lead to segregation being outlawed across the nation. </p>
 <p>	Starring in this film is Sidney Poitier who played Thurgood Marshall the NAACP lawyer from Howard University who took the struggle for equal rights to the Supreme Court and won. Burt Lancaster plays John W. Davis, the opposing lawyer. John Davis was called the lawyers lawyer and was viewed as one of the best lawyers in the states. After becoming a losing presidential candidate Davis's reputation as a lawyer went up. He worked for big corporations and made a lot of money. With a lawyer of Davis's stature going up against Thurgood Marshall the odds were clearly not in Marshall's favor. The Chief Justice Earl Warren was played by Richard Kiley. Warren was once the Governor of California, and he was appointed to the court by Dwight Eisenhower while the case was still being considered. <a target="_blank" name="tn15content" id="tn15content"></a> Warren's wanted all of the justices to come together and get a unanimous decision in this case. However, a handful of justices refused to vote for the removal segregation because of the precedents of the Plessy v. Ferguson decision and their own personal agendas.</p>
 <p>	The main struggle in the film was for the desegregation of schools and several of the concepts and ideas from class were discussed in the film. One of the major ideas that jumped out to me from class was the 14th Amendment. The 14th amendment constantly was mentioned in the film. The fourteenth amendment is a post civil war amendment meant to ensure equal rights for former slaves. The fourteenth Amendment includes the right to due process.  Due process the protection of all of a persons legal rights not just most of them. The fourteenth amendment also contains the Equal Protection clause. The equal protection clause promises that all American citizens have equal protection under the law. The equal protection clause is also to support the statement that “all men are created equal” as it's stated in the constitution. The fourteenth amendment also provided a definition of what it truly means to be an American citizen which overturned the Plessy v Ferguson decision which excluded African Americans. The definition provided by the fourteenth amendment states that if you're born on US soil you are an American citizen.</p>
 <p>	The precedents set by the Plessy v Ferguson case also played a large role in the film. Several of the justices on the bench didn't want to vote to remove segregation from society because of the precedents set even though they knew that it was morally wrong. But the justices weren't the only ones affected by the Plessy v. Ferguson decision it also took a toll on the people fighting to reverse it's decision. They feared that the policy has been in place for so long that it was a lost cause to try to fight it. In the book it briefly talks about the power that precedents have over American government. Precedents basically outline what is expected and once something has gone unchallenged for so long it becomes harder to change as time goes on.</p>
 <p>	Also during class we talked about the duties of each of the branches of government. This also appears a bit in the film. The Chief Justice in the film was appointed by the president at the time Dwight Eisenhower. This is an example of one of the checks and balances that we discussed in class. Also it was the job of the judicial branch to interpret the laws to decide whether segregation is constitutional or not. As the people in the film state it's their job to interpret the laws, not make them which accurately reflects th duties of the judicial branch.</p>
 <p>	In class we also discussed the differences between moralism and pragmatism in foreign policy. In the film foreign policies aren't discussed but a similar theme occurs throughout the film. The court justices have to decide amongst themselves if they wish to approach the issue of segregation in a moral or pragmatist fashion. When I say this I mean that they have to decide if they want to truly protect the human rights of all Americans or themselves and white America. The justices seem to be split between the morally correct way of things and their own personal agendas which has a lot to do with this case taking as long as it did. America is supposed to be a nation that's built on morality </p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FDocumentary%2FSeparate-But-Equal.66602"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FDocumentary%2FSeparate-But-Equal.66602" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:54:45 PST</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
