<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Reflection</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/tags/Reflection</link>
<description>New posts about Reflection</description>
<item>
<title>Sicko: A Reflective Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Documentary/Sicko-A-Reflective-Analysis.262945</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<h3><strong>Introduction</strong></h3>
<p>When watching a documentary or any film, you must always consider the reason, motivation and the angle at which the creator of that piece envisions in it. Michael Moore's documentary film is as much entertainment as it is educational. Of course it raises the serious questions about our Health Care system while highlighting its failures but throughout the film, you will find yourself more entertained than being lectured. That may be intentionally done to expose the broken Health Care system in the US with a comical atmosphere while addressing a serious issue without having to rave on like a raging lunatic. Or, it could have simply need a marketing ploy to get the viewers in America to watch his films, thereby earning him yet another title he can be proud of while his wallet bulges with some serious cash.&amp;nbsp; But whatever his personal reasons are, the film does raise valid questions and objections to unethical practices of the insurance companies and the broken system.</p>
<h3><strong>Land of Opportunities</strong></h3>
<p>America has always been called a land of opportunities where equality of opportunity is championed by its average citizens. So should the child of an investment banker and a child of a gasoline attendant worker deserve the same health care in America? I would say why not. Children are our future and in a country that is easily labeled as the most powerful and the richest should just as easily be labeled the most caring with the least child mortality rate. Sadly, this is not true of America. We are rich, powerful and famous but our Child mortality rates are not the best especially when considering that certain 3<sup>rd</sup> world nations have better child health care than us. But does that mean everyone should receive care? That is the debate that still rages on in our country but it is essential that all Permanent Residents and Citizens of US should receive full child health care, if not full health care privileges for all - period.</p>
<h3><strong>Corporate America</strong></h3>
<p>In Sicko, one of the most touching anecdotal accounts was a woman that was working at the insurance company. She is a phone receptionist and in a documentary where the insurance companies are portrayed as unfeeling demons, she serves as a human face that is touched by the issue. You have to understand that insurance companies are essentially people also, business trying to make a living. And even though the companies have made some serious cash, in the end, it is a business practice. Before I saw this account of this woman, I had that image of uncaring individuals sitting behind computer terminals denying claims from patients. But that account was very shocking to see because I just did not expect to see people that "feel" the pain and understand the situation working for the insurance companies. So it was essentially a shock as that view that I had was changed dramatically within few minutes. But that was somewhat replaced when the statement from the hearing of Dr. Linda Pino was made that claimed that insurance companies gave doctors who worked for them better pay and bonuses and ratings if they denied claims. Then in the movie by the time all the explanations was done, I was placed with a feeling that the insurance company exists to only reject the claim with any sort of excuse they can get. Such a notion I cannot possible imagine without getting a shiver of fear and foreboding - because then our Health Care system if truly doomed. I do however; disagree with the wide unethical practices applied by the health care insurance providers in determining how many drugs, how long and for how much a patient can receive health care. I also totally disagree with the practice of kickbacks and other "privileges" the companies give doctors who prescribe formulary drugs or other prescriptions that they want the doctors to give out to the patients. So to hear that from Dr. Linda Pino was not all too surprising as it already happens throughout our country's hospitals, private practices and other health care facilities - even though it is generally illegal.</p>
<h3><strong>Issues Raised &amp;amp; Facts</strong></h3>
<p>Sicko also raises the issue of how we are not able to fix our health care system when our friends in Europe and near our border are capable of fixing theirs. We also begin to see the encroachment of greed and corporate influences into our health care policies and the politics that determine those policies. The President's Commission on health care goes just short of declaring the need for better health care (universal) in America so I want to know why, if not what, prevents our political parties and forces from instituting wide reaching health care reform for the sake of the people. The documentary also showed me the widespread consequences of our current system of care. I never imagined the insured people would have so many problems. Usually we only hear of the 48 million uninsured Americans but the plight of even the insured Americans is just or even worse than the uninsured. That is one important message I learned from the movie. And of course, it is time we fix our system even more. The movie praised Canada and Cuba a lot for their good care system even though on the world list, Canada is ranked #30 and Cuba is #39 while we are in #37. Even though that seems really bad, we are doing well in regards to the medical care but it is the expense that is destroying lives and making our system worse than it really is. If we can find a way to manage our Health Care expenses - perhaps with taxes or some other means, then we will surely have the best Health Care system in the world.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FDocumentary%2FSicko-A-Reflective-Analysis.262945"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FDocumentary%2FSicko-A-Reflective-Analysis.262945" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:29:25 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Zoolander: A Reflection of Modern Companies?</title>
<link>http://www.cinemaroll.com/Cinemarolling/Zoolander-A-Reflection-of-Modern-Companies.31930</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Zoolander first appears to most people as a sit back and laugh comedy. However, there is a much deeper meaning inside of all of the comedy. Large companies will often value profits more than human life and rights. The fashion corporation in this film attempts to do away with child labor laws and minimum wage in third world countries, uses murder to help out their profits, and are so corrupt that they can not just make a good product to make a profit. </p>

 <p>The newly elected prime minister of Malaysia publicly announces that he will make child labor laws and raise the minimum wage in Malaysia. This hurts the fashion company because most of their products are made in sweat shops in Malaysia or other third world countries. They fear that if Malaysia starts this trend of no more child labor and higher wage then the company will be losing millions of dollars, trying to pay for all of the higher wages. In retaliation the company sends Mugato on a mission to kill the prime minister without revealing their evil plot. In the end, Zoolander does not kill the prime minister and Mugato is taken off to jail. This shows that the writers did not believe that child labor and low minimum wages is a good thing because the corporation does not win and Malaysia abolishes child labor for good. </p>

 <p>According to the move, male models have been behind every political assassination for the past 200 years. Abraham Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery but the slaves made the powdered wigs for all of the rich people. Without the free labor they would lose lots of money so they had model/actor John Wilkes Booth kill Lincoln. John F. Kennedy put a trade embargo on Cuba raising the prices of a common clothing item they got from Cuba. So, they hired the two male models on the grassy knoll to kill him. Now with the prime minister of Malaysia because of the child labor laws. This is an example of big companies that value profit over human life.</p>

 <p>This movie shows that companies can become so corrupt that they rely on unethical practices to ensure success. You can see the crooked ways in the move such as using employees as scapegoats to cover for their own crimes. One example of this is framing Derrick so it looks like he killed the prime minister out of his own will. This is a funny depiction but a problem with real world companies like ENRON and WorldCom.   </p>

 <p>Even though this is a great comedy, <STRONG>Zoolander</STRONG> shows a real problem in our modern society. Companies today can become crooked and forget about human life and rights so they can make a profit. This movie shows that we need to put an end to the evil and corrupt practices in our modern society.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FCinemarolling%2FZoolander-A-Reflection-of-Modern-Companies.31930"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinemaroll.com%2FCinemarolling%2FZoolander-A-Reflection-of-Modern-Companies.31930" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 04:01:30 PST</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
