You can have a look at all pictures mentioned in this article here

The Bridge

The first thing I thought when I saw this was that it looks very "Star Trek The Motion Picture". But on second thought its also very different from anything we have seen before. It´s hard to judge from one image, but the bridge seems to be much bigger then it used to be. The additional screens that used to be above the backward bridge stations in the Original Series have been turned into a band of flat screens. Another recognisable element that´s there is the railing behind the command chair. At least one of the doors seems to be in a very different place (next to the two transparent "room dividers"). The over all color scheme of the screens and consoles is blue, but everything might turn red during red alert. They have added a table to Kirk´s right which might be some kind of additional navigation device...or a secretary table.

The Uniforms

The uniforms are probably the only thing that didn´t change much at all. The overall look is the same, although they´re now using a black undershirt. The gold uniform seems to be the same as always, the red and blue variants seem less bright. The rang stripes on the sleeves are still there but they are now silver instead of gold.

Nero

He´s easily recognisable as a Romulan. A notable change is that his ear looks based on the vulcan ones but still very different. Is the tattoo a common Romulan thing, or something special to nero?

The USS Kelvin

We haven´t seen any pictures of the Enterprise exterior besides the "under-construction" view from the teaser. The close up of the Kelvin makes it seem that the design is actually very close to the one used in the TOS-era movies. I prefer the original pearl white to the darker hull color they are using.

The Bridge Crew

Its not easy to comment on the crew from the little material we have. Quinto as Spock really looks a lot like the young Nimoy.

Overall Impression

So far I´m very impressed. It could have been much worse. If those few pictures are any indication then its true what the production crew keeps repeating like a mantra: "Its true to the original but new and different".

Most of the now-famous James Bond movies were based on the 1953 novel by Ian Flemming entitled ?Casino Royale?. The 1953 novel is set during the Cold War and provides insightful information and delves deep into the origins of 007. Daniel Craig was in the potential ?type-for-cast? category after his starring in the 2004 film ?Layer Cake? through which he starred as a criminal trying to escape his law-breaking past. Daniel is the son of a steel worker as a father and art teacher as a mother and was born and raised in the city of Chester. Casino Royale is the 21st official James Bond movie. The James Bond movies have definitely never grown faint in popularity. Daniel Craig gets the so called ?bashed and bloodied? treatment as a reviewer commented on the filming of the movie. Daniel lost a tooth cap in a punch-up scene.

As Daniel pressed on to filming the rest of the movie he endured cuts, bruises and a torture scene in which he was hit in the ?sensitive spots? by a knotted rope. The ravaged Daniel also injured a tendon in a high-speed foot chase. All of these injuries were endured by painkillers and physiotherapy. What is the price to pay for realism? Daniel certainly endured pain as the price for realism. Daniel Craig commented during filming that ?I got fit for a reason, I didn?t just get fit because I was taking my shirt off, I knew that I wanted to get involved with every step of the film process?.

He said this because ?Casino Royale? was a big step in his movie career. Daniel?s movie career did not take off until the dawn of the new millennium in which in those years he starred in ?Layer Cake?, ?Lara Croft: Tomb Raider?, ?Road To Perdition?, ?Sylvia? and ?Enduring Love?. His most recent roles in ?Munich? and ?Infamous? have rest assured his acclaim. Craig was apparently keen to play the new Bond despite factors of him losing his privacy in the movie business, so ?the script must have been up to par enough for Daniel? a reviewer commented. Casino Royale is apparently geared more towards love and romance that is old-fashioned love and romance, seeing that in this film, not every girl Bond meets is prancing around in a bikini. According to a reviewer, even Daniel was aware of that and agreed that the new movie was more into romance than previous movies.

Daniel is the new Bond that is the first that has blue eyes and is a blonde. James Bond movies will probably continue to entertain moviegoers everywhere. With the movies? hyper expensive special effects that appear infeasible to the average male, and bonds sly secret moves that never go awry will keep the public constellating to theatres everywhere. Moviegoers will continue to be pleased in every way. Will the mushy new romance in ?Casino Royale? be too much for the moviegoer? Who knows, but for now the movies have been successful and many previous Bonds from old movies have well-wished Daniel Craig. Daniel has also signed on for another Bond movie later in his movie career.

No, no, I haven't seen the movie, but it is scheduled for a 2007 release. It is entitled "Diary of the Dead" and it takes place during the same time as "Night of the Living Dead", so essentially Romero is taking us back to the beginning.

The movie revolves around some film students who are making a horror film of their own, until they run into some zombies and their lives undoubtedly take a turn for the worse. Not much else is known about this, except that some fairly unknown actors are being used and the movie is “a hundred percent independent”, as Romero stated in a letter he wrote to Ain't It Cool News.

“This one comes from the heart. It's not a sequel or a remake. It's a whole new beginning for the dead,” said Romero.

I guess since he has been keeping the movie under wraps that it really would be hard to know anything about it, but I'm excited anyway. I'm excited for Georgie boy to redeem himself after the disappointing "Land". His original "Day of the Dead", which came out in 1985, was ridiculous in a good way, but his fourth installment in the series just didn't do it for me. 'Night of the Living Dead' and "Dawn of the Dead" remain untouched by my criticism because, well, they're great.

A remake of "Day of the Dead" looks to be coming out in 2007 as well, although originally I think it was planned to be released in April. There isn't much else known about this one either and all this holding off is probably not a good sign. Nonetheless, 2007 could prove to be a very fun year for zombie fans.

It doesn't matter how bad or how corny a zombie movie looks, because I will want to watch it. However, thanks to the rising costs of theater tickets, I now have to decide how worthy some movies are, but I have enough patience to wait for the DVD.

Speaking of DVD, doesn't it feel like these companies are phasing out the DVD like they did with videotapes and the VCR?