The theory of psychoanalysis is based upon the character's relationships and how the use of symbolism, as a form of representation, is also a prospect of this psychoanalysis.
Introduction
Freudian theory of psychoanalysis has been the main source for many directors and producers who created films in the thriller genre since the 1940s. They used this theory as a plot device in many films to fulfill the need of the audience for such films with psychotherapy and psychoanalysis during the period of World War II and post- World War II. Among other films shot within this theory is Alfred Hitchcock's Spellbound (1945), nominated for six Academy Awards. "Psychoanalytic theory is central" in this film (Sterritt, 1993:88).
Spellbound, focuses on the use of many experiences, in highlighting the identity of one of the main characters, Ballantine (Gregory Peck) who suffers from amnesia. In the forefront of these experiences is Dr Constance Peterson (Ingrid Bergman). As Gilligan rightly revealed, “Freudian analysis helped Bergman … to uncover Gregory Peck's past” (Gilligan, 2003:379). Spellbound, "presented an effective use of psychiatry and psychoanalysis as plot ingredients" to reinforce the "bourgeois reality" of the post-World War II (Spears & Wood, 1971:320; 1998:47).
The dream sequence, which was designed by Dali, fits very well into this effectiveness of marginalized situation. This essay intends to analyze Hitchcock's film Spellbound by the use of Freudian and post-Freudian theory. It is not intended to discuss character analysis as such, although so much of the theory of psychoanalysis is based upon the character's relationships. Secondly, the analysis of the use of symbolism, as a form of representation, is also a prospect of this paper.
Fantasies and Reality
Guilt Complex: Repeated Motifs
Spellbound's use of ideas that are drawn from Freud's discoveries, of concepts like repressed memories, includes the main theme of “how it is that in our normal state we are able to distinguish between fantasy and reality” (Freud, 1991:225). For Boyd “fantasy itself … is Oedipal in nature” and it leads to “Freudian depths of incestuous desire and patricidal guilt” (Boyd, 2000: http://www.sensesofcinema.com).
For example the ideas of guilt complex identifiable throughout the film are used to determine the main plot. It is this guilt complex, triggered by the accidental killing of his brother in his childhood that has caused Ballantine's amnesia and made him believe that he is the one who killed Dr Edwards. From this point Spellbound contrasts Ballantine with the other patient in the film who suffers from guilt complex, and believes that he has killed his father, using this as a conjunction to highlight similarities with Oedipal themes, but in function to the fabula.
For Žižek these "repeated motifs" linked with Freud's "compulsion to repeat" are in function of both the story and the visual complex in the film (Žižek, 1992:126). Similarly Greenberg sees it as “appreciated only in repeated viewings; with its subtle insistence of the influence of childhood conflict upon adult destiny” (Greenberg, 1993:138). Also, Spellbound explores the distinctive ideas of the new replacing the old, such as when Dr Edwards was to replace Dr Murchison as the head of the Green Manors mental asylum.
The Paternal Function: Politicized Experience
The notion of politics used in the psychoanalysis of Spellbound takes for granted the existence of power relations that are linked with basic social structures and that are involved in the construction of each individual. For Silverman, Spellbound speaks “to the failure of the paternal function” (Silverman, 1992:52). For instance, the “individual task” that Constance undertakes “in order to begin to escape from the spaces, roles, and gestures that [she has] been assigned and taught by the society of men” is among other facts contributes to the “experience to be politicized” (Irigaray, 1977:164).
Obviously all this "experience" is under question because it has not taken “into consideration the specific exploitation of woman” (1977:165). As for Mulvey it is a "political weapon" of the patriarchal system (Mulvey, 1975:6). The fact that Constance's picture was in front of the newspapers when she abandoned Green Manors to find Ballantine clarifies that she has been "prescribed by the patriarchal system", but the presence of the two investigators, face to face with Constance and Ballantine in Dr Brulov's house, brings the conclusion that the “patriarchal system” is not functioning properly. For Irigaray, “politics has … questioned its own relation to phallocratic power” (1977:165).
However, Constance instantly contributes to this as “the unattractive "woman" who knows too much” (Žižek 1992:125). “She finds the signifier of her own desire in the body of the one” who is Ballantine “to whom she addresses her demand for love” (Irigaray, 1977:62). Irigaray's theory highlights this concept as: “dialectic of relations that are sexualized by the phallic function” (1977:62). Grosz's response to Irigaray's "plallocentrism" concludes that, “the patriarchal symbolic order leaves no space or form of representation for women's autonomy” (Grosz, 1990:174). For Grosz “the relations each sex has to the phallus”, leads to the fact that this relation “defines the structure of romantic relations between them” (1990:116).
Relations and mother figure
It's cool. It's very professional. Exellent! Good points and very good research. Academic piece of writting and very well linked together.
#5 by Ben, Feb 1, 2008
Psychoanalysis are used in a clear connection of the film contest. I agree and like what you comment on it. Fantastic research! Well done, you should publish it in Screen...
Welldone mate!
#6 by Alex, Feb 11, 2008
I found it an excellent piece of reading. Well done!
#7 by Aida, Feb 11, 2008
Reading this essay just reminded me what my postgraduate lectures has mention to me about 'thoughts'. Excellent!
#8 by Billy, Feb 13, 2008
It has been nice to hear from you such good work, since we left our studies at LSBU. To be clear it was one of the enjoyable essay I have read so far. Thanks.
#9 by Gareth Michaell Hill, Feb 14, 2008
I like it for God sake. It was a very pleased to read to the end.
#10 by Charlote Coward, Feb 14, 2008
Excellent!
I like it...
#11 by Lee, Feb 25, 2008
I think it should be seen in an properly academic magazine, like Screen, and not just here.
Best of luck
#12 by Desdemona, Mar 4, 2008
I agree with comments. This is very lovely essay...
Fantastic.
#13 by Bertie, Mar 4, 2008
Psychoanalysis are the most evaluated theory in this essay. I love it.
#14 by Adrian, Mar 4, 2008
I like it. V.G.
#15 by Pota Ouluser Londo University of Printing and Design, Mar 12, 2008
I have spend reading on Hitchcock so I found it fantastic. Well done.
#16 by Brian Lee, Mar 12, 2008
Sounds O.K.
#17 by Alex Sploux, Mar 12, 2008
Hitchcock is my favourite, but Freud unaceptable... Works as Spellbound. Thumbs Up.
#18 by Siobnah, Mar 18, 2008
When imagination is not any more dream the dream comes to reality. Well done mate...
Love Siobnah.
#19 by Keze (Kozeta) Zylo, Apr 5, 2008
I enjoyed reading Freudian Thoughts. I appreciated what you find to be true, and critcize the part of false. Your analysis is so precise and brillant.
#20 by ROBERT MARTIKO, Apr 8, 2008
Psychoanalysis resembles a journey into a dark forest.
Definitely, it is an extraordinary experience. Nothing more. While looking up at the sky, along with stars you can see the endless world of Mystery and Universe…
Robert Martiko
#21 by albert, May 30, 2008
Freud is unbeliavable analised in a very interesting way. Well done
#22 by Ndrek Gjini, Jul 6, 2008
Thank you my friend. i hope i will be in touch soon. e-mail me please.